Archive for January, 2010

Voters and Their “Senseless” Stories

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

posted by Sam Richards

thinking-outside-the-boxIt’s unfortunate that this story is written only with examples of liberals not being able to convince conservatives because the latter are not thinking straight. There are an equal number of examples of conservatives not being able to get through to the “misguided liberals” because such purportedly progressive thinkers can’t get outside their locked mental cages of short-sighted intellect.

Here would be an example: Think about how so-called “liberals” spend so much time questioning the defense-security-war-aggression policies of the United States, policies that lead their government into actions and interventions in other countries that are harmful and sometimes criminal. Here I’m not just talking about “illegal” wars but also the sale and distribution of weapons that kill innocent people (like landmines), subsidizing our farmers so that we can dump cheap rice in places like Haiti (and thereby impoverish Haitian farmers in the process), and so on. Most activists at peace and protest rallies are liberal-minded and most of them never give a thought to the myriad ways in which their day-to-day actions help keep this unjust system in place or how they personally would protest loudly and vigorously if their leaders suddenly decided to rectify some of the unjust policies that they march on Washington, DC to change. When the price of rice doubles, for example, or thousands of family farms go under in the southeastern United States, the protest chants would simply change to call out the U.S. government for not caring about its own people—even though Haitian farmers would be dancing in the streets.

Read the article: “Why Do People Often Vote Against Their Interests?”

The Enlightened “West” Knows Best

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

posted by Sam Richards

niqabThis issue has meaning for me now that I visited one of the most conservative of Muslim countries where women in the “niqab” or “abeyya” or “hijab” were all around me. Certainly many of the more Western oriented women only worn the abeyya intermittently, and many refused to wear it at all, but many extremely progressive women wore it in the same way that many “progressive” women in the U.S. wear high heels, make-up, and nylon stockings. Like their American counterparts, few claim to be victims of a male-oriented, oppressive culture. Rather, they take it as a matter of course.

No doubt there are more than a few women throughout the Muslim world who feel oppressed by the mandate to cover up, but I’m thinking that the vast majority just go along for the ride–and a much smaller percentage totally embrace the experience as a path toward spiritual and psychological growth. (I have to believe, much like the two women in this video.) So my question is related to the French government and people who think they know best for Muslim women — “We are going to turn you into enlightened French citizens.” What should they wear to demonstrate this? Perhaps skin tight jeans and high heels? A tight fitting shirt with an under wire bra? Thong underwear? That’s enlightened…not to mention comfortable.

Seems to me that truly enlightened governance allows people to pursue the path toward self awareness and growth that best suits them — as long as they don’t harm others in the meantime.

I Guess It Pays to Learn a Bit About Other People

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

posted by Sam Richards

US Airways Express Flight 3079, bound for Kentucky, landed in Philadelphia after an attendant reported a passenger who was praying and wearing tefillin.

US Airways Express Flight 3079, bound for Kentucky, landed in Philadelphia after an attendant reported a passenger who was praying and wearing tefillin.

Strange how there is so much going on in the world that is boringly normal for one group and totally off-the-hook bizzare for another. While I am undoubtedly in the group of people in the U.S. that could be labelled “more aware” of others and their cultures, I would be quick to admit that there are things going on around me, cultural practices if you will, that I don’t understand and cannot make sense of.

So here is this quirky story about a young Jewish man who made the “mistake” of praying and wearing tefillin while flying on an airplane. Most of you don’t know what “teffilin” is–and why would you if you’re not Jewish?  Hmm… Actually, why would you if you’re not Jewish and familiar with a wide range of Jewish religious practices?

tefillin
What’s interesting about this misadventure in flying and cultural interpretation is how the Jewish families (and other Jews who were interviewed) reacted to it–they were very nonchalant and understanding.  “Are you kidding,” you can almost hear them say.  “Have you seen someone praying with tefillin?”  It’s a very rational response to what could otherwise be seen as a mistake made by a rather provincial and unworldly airline employee.

Read the article from the New York Times: “A Flight Is Diverted By a Prayer Seen As Ominous”

Racism Looks Pretty Mild on This Side of the Atlantic

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

posted by Sam Richards

This video about the prevalence of racism in the world of European soccer should get some conversation going. In comparison to the racism that exists here in the United States, the actions by these sports fans is extreme and vile — like stuff we’d have witnessed here a hundred years ago. And if these sorts of shenanigans happened in our professional sports stadiums, all manner of actions would be taken to stop them. But on that “enlightened” continent of Europe, for one reason or another they continue and are, to be sure, rather common place in many stadiums. (That said, I am certain that most fans do not support the barbarians clamoring at the turnstyles.)

As you watch the video, keep in mind a couple of things. First, while the video depicts events that are four years old, very little (if anything at all) has changed. European football organizations have taken the initiative to put a stop to the actions of fans, but they’ve not made much headway. Second, this is less about race and more about culture and the perceived threats related to immigration and the growing numbers of “dark skinned” peoples from southern countries, especially those of sub-Sarahan Africa. Europe is in the middle of an unprecedented cultural transformation stemming from widening immigration flows and (white) people are afraid they’re losing their hold on their cultures. This does not excuse their actions and thinking, but it should clarify it a bit and it must be considered in order to understand the causes and consequences of the behavior.

The video is very unnerving, to say the least, but I’m sure it will lead you to pause and reflect on just how far we have come in dealing with our own racism.

Last Name Begins with “U” or “V” or “Y” or “Z” (e.g., Brian Zabrowski)

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name Begins with “W”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name Begins with “T”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name Begins with “S”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name Begins with “R”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name Begins With “P” or “Q”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name Begins with “N” or “O”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name Begins with “M”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name Begins with “L”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name Begins with “K”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name Begins with “I” or “J”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name Begins With “H”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name Begins with “G”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name Begins with “F”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name Begins with “E”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name Begins with “D”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name Begins with “C”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name begins with “B”

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response.

Last Name begins with A (e.g., Brian Anderson)

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Make a one word response to this post.

Haiti’s Calamity

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

posted by Laurie Mulvey

crucifixion

I have spent my adult years piecing together an ecumenical spirituality in which I use the symbols and teachings of many religious traditions to help me comprehend the intangible and unknowable parts of Life that we all encounter. But I have never fully grasped the central idea of Christianity—Jesus as sacrifice. I’ve never understood how one person’s suffering could somehow liberate another person, how the crucifixion of Christ could lead me toward salvation.

Until the earthquake in Haiti. I don’t have to recount the misery that is taking place in that small island nation. We all know that it is simply too much for anyone to bear. It is a calamity completely outside any idea I have of fairness or a spiritual force that might guide our lives if we are in “right relation” to it.

But as I hold still and listen to the news and the jumbled voice of a Haitian friend standing in the rubble with his cell phone and pleading for me to understand something impossible to understand (“No horror movie is as bad as this,” he says), I feel things shift inside of me. I notice that I’m less concerned with my possessions, my ideas, my hopes, the things I think I deserve. I am more willing to give, to help, to care about someone else. “What would someone from Haiti do?” I find myself asking, as the question invokes the otherworldly anguish of the images and stories that have become commonplace broadcasts from this broken land. Time and again, the question pulls me away from self-importance and into alignment with things like caring and community.

Maybe we are in the presence of another crucifixion.

Please understand that I am not saying that the earthquake in Haiti was the will of the Creator, meant to liberate the rest of us, or that it was the destiny of the Haitian people to be sacrificed for the betterment of our souls. Life is a series of random acts and events—and the earthquake was one of them.
haiti
What I am saying is that acknowledging this suffering, knowing full well that I cannot relieve it (“No aid can compare to the magnitude of what happened here,” my friend tells me), and allowing it to work inside of me may just be what the symbol of the crucifixion is pointing towards.

I still think my Sunday School teachers got it wrong: Jesus didn’t die for me. But truly recognizing real suffering just may have the power to pull me away from my “sins” (you know, things like desire and jealousy, greed and selfishness).

So, whether it is the image of the cross or the ruins of a nation, maybe the simple gesture of holding the anguish of another in our mind’s eye can transform us—if we just keep ourselves open to it.

Clubbing the “Bejesus” Out of Rationality

Sunday, January 17th, 2010

posted by Sam Richards

pat_robertson
Believe me when I say that I don’t need another reason for wishing that Pat Robertson’s “savior” would just go ahead and call him home. And so why am I talking about this man who is posing as preacher who is posing as an asylum escapee? (Or is it the other way around?)

Here’s what he said about Haiti:

(CNN) — Pat Robertson, the evangelical Christian and host of the “700 Club,” says a “pact to the devil” brought on the devastating earthquake in Haiti.

Robertson blamed the tragedy on something that “happened a long time ago in Haiti, and people might not want to talk about it.” The Haitians “were under the heel of the French. You know, Napoleon III and whatever,” Robertson said on his broadcast Wednesday. “And they got together and swore a pact to the devil. They said, ‘We will serve you if you will get us free from the French.’ True story. And so, the devil said, ‘OK, it’s a deal.’ “

As lame as it may seem, my excuse for bring this up is that I want to make a point about the dangers of living in world of good and evil, black and white while remaining completely surrounded by others who see things just as we do. Seriously. I’ll admit that when I first read Robertson’s words I wanted to go for the jugular. Thumbs to windpipe. But then so many others have done taken up the cause that I decided that I just needed to make a sociological point.

Here’s Olbermann. Ouch. I don’t have to keep up in the ratings and so I don’t need to be so vicious. But truthfully, I can’t say that I’m offended by Olbermann’s attack on a “man of the cloth.” But those are not my thoughts.

Thinking that the “country of Haiti” made a pact with the Devil two centuries ago is probably a pretty good indication that Robertson is mentally ill. Did they actually sign something with ink and a quill? Was there some sort of referendum in which the entire Haitian population participated or was it just a single Haitian leader? I mean really, was the devil hanging out in the Carribean a couple of hundred years ago searching for an unwitting victim in the form of an entire country?

If you encountered someone on the street who told you that the devil is making a pact with, let’s say, Detroit to bring back the auto industry, you wouldn’t give them the time of day. You’d assume that they had gone off their meds and you’d probably be correct. But here’s a guy with a viewing audience in the millions who is saying a similar thing and nobody seems to be changing the channels. Moreover, Robertson himself is not saying that he was wrong in making such statements. This is largely because he doesn’t have people around him to challenge his thinking. The most dangerous position a person can be in, by the way, is that of embracing a black and white ideology of good and bad, right and wrong and not having people around us who think differently than we do and who can reflect alternative ideas back to us.

That the media put a voice to mentally ill people clearly says something about how the rest of us want to see ourselves as superior others or, in this case, be entertained by our own self-righteous indignation. Be clear that few Christians would agree with Robertson and, in fact, I can’t say that I know of any. But when he refuses to take his meds and makes his outlandish comments, then the rest of can feel better about ourselves and so we keep tuning in. “Well, now that guy really is a nut.” Sure, there are a million or so of us who listen to the guy on a regular basis, but even most of these people likely write off these sorts of nutty ideas as a slip of the tongue.

This all goes to say that Olbermann gives Robertson way too much credibility by responding as though the guy is living with a full deck. Let’s just move on.

As a final caveat, the crazy thing is that when I read Robertson’s comments for the first time I actually thought to myself, “Hey, I don’t remember reading this.” Seriously. I got suckered into the man’s insanity for a brief moment. LOL.

In case anyone is interested, here is Jon Stewart discussing these knuckleheads (and Rachel Maddow).

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Haiti Earthquake Reactions
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Health Care Crisis